Caution! XXX cookies
Not for young eyes!
Although – they’re sold for kids!
And maybe it is me – but you can tell me if you think I’m right or wrong.
Rudi and I found this interesting, though!
We bought a bag of organic animal crackers at a large Canadian drugstore. We just wanted something very plain to snack on when we were driving in the car.
And I’d say that 90% were more interesting than the minority of them.
Here’s one of the “normal” ones.
And an embellished one –
Does that bear have a little something extra? Or is it me?
How about this – um – ram?
Oh my.
Now this could be a third leg…
But this lion would then have five.
And then what’s going on with this elephant?!
Anatomically-correct animal crackers?
What a concept!
My gratefuls – That we got some shopping done today – gifts for our taxi driver and her kids back home, and some size very small shirts for me. That it was Hawaii 5-O night last night. That we’re eating some great Japanese treats that Rudi brought back for me. That the weather has been glorious and we saw some gold/yellow trees today that were absolutely glowing!
Are there no female animal crackers???
Brigitte Carey said this on 18 October 2011 at 8:46 am
Love the elephant! I think someone needs to take a second look at that cookie mold design.
Seasweetie said this on 18 October 2011 at 10:07 am
Apparently not, Brigitte!
Which now begs the question – if there are no females, how do they make MORE animal crackers??
photokunstler said this on 18 October 2011 at 11:56 am
Weirdly – 10% of animals in the bag were rated G!
So how can 10 of 100 be perfectly acceptable for sticking in your kid’s lunchbox, and the other 90/100 be borderline questionable?
I’d love to see the look on the face of the teacher on lunch duty…
photokunstler said this on 18 October 2011 at 11:58 am
They clone them???
Brigitte Carey said this on 18 October 2011 at 6:35 pm
Aha! More cloned animals.
It’s sickening!
photokunstler said this on 18 October 2011 at 6:35 pm
I think the only one that is truly questionable is the elephant the others obviously have bellies that are being obscured by their legs. I just can;t get the elephants “belly” to match up from front to back… so that makes 10% questionable and 90% open to interpretation right? At least in my eyes… it is all in the eye of the beholder. Denis is withholding comments about anatomy, he says you eat the cookie you don’t examine your cookie.
Amanda said this on 18 October 2011 at 11:59 pm
🙂 Amanda.
Tell Denis that if he doesn’t check out the cookie in advance of eating it, how will he know if he’s eating, well…. pee pees?
I actually wish I’d saved the correct versions of these cookies to shoot too, so you could compare how they were really supposed to look with the way they turned out!
photokunstler said this on 19 October 2011 at 12:00 am
lol. Thanks for the laughs.
Amanda said this on 19 October 2011 at 8:53 am
🙂 Amanda.
photokunstler said this on 19 October 2011 at 9:32 am